My Initial Reflections on AI
Most of us can remember when the FIRST
word-processors came into general use. I have spent most of my
professional life writing scientific papers. My earliest papers were
typed on a typewriter with the typist committing her novel errors in
addition to my own. I was among the first graduate students to type
my own dissertation, with my wife's help, on to an Apple IIe computer
with tractor-feed paper. Thus, having already experienced the many,
many advantages of word-processors, I was frustrated that my research
university was slow in adopting it. I know well that word-processing
made my career so very much more productive and enjoyable than it
would have been with typewriters.
We are now so accustomed to
word-processors that few of us have seen a typewriter in many years.
One aspect of the word-processor is that all programs now have
“Spelling and Grammar” checking options. As a University
professor, I do NOT recall anyone having ethical reservations about
using spell-checkers on word-processors.
With AI generation of written work, we
see word-processing “on steroids”. Now we have much, much more
than spell-checking. But, hopefully we having learned a bit from the
popular adoption of word-processing, I would suggest:
AI text generation is here to
stay.
AI use in writing is extremely
difficult, though not impossible, to detect.
It is an amoral tool—though my
friend, Dr. Richard Edlin, does point out that AI creators do have
moral & ethical positions and it would be impossible for those
not to manifest in AI products.
AI is a tool, like
word-processing, and it, like the computer itself, like electricity,
like most technology, has good and bad aspects. E.g. The World Wide
Web has made it possible to minister the Gospel worldwide in
seconds, it has also make internet pornography a very convenient
means for serious sin.
AI is a tool, and it should be
utilized for the good of mankind, with acknowledgment that it will
also be abused to the detriment of mankind.
The only ethical restriction I can
envision, is that like plagiarism, we must not use AI's words
without rightfully acknowledging them. (Note that we did not require
that of word-processing use, but it was adopted so fully that
everyone knew it was being used—perhaps AI will be the same and
only when it is NOT used would that be noted.)
AI is a tool that is here to stay. Let
us explore ways to ethically use AI to help us all. As Ecclesiastes
1:9 tells us, “There is nothing new under the sun!.” G^d is not
surprised by AI. Mankind is clearly fallen. I predict, with
certainty, that AI will be used for evil, and for good. AI may
contribute to the end of the world, but G^d is omniscient, omnipotent
and still interested in mankind, and in charge. We don't put our
faith in technology but in the G^d who created man, and everything in
the cosmos (Gen 1:1).
For a deeper, fuller discussion of
these issues see, Edlin, Richard (June 2023). It’s a matter of the
heart: Thinking Christianly about ChatGPT & AI. It can be found
at,
All of Life Redeemed.
https://www.allofliferedeemed.co.uk/RJE2023ChatGPT.pdf